top of page

Elevated Magazines - Premium Lifestyle Content

From the superyachts making waves at Monaco to the estates redefining luxury living in Palm Beach, the automotive debuts turning heads in Geneva, and the artists commanding record prices at auction — Elevated Magazines captures the luxury lifestyle stories, brands, and cultural moments that have the world's most discerning audiences talking right now.

What Should a Fractional COO Achieve in the First 90 Days?

Sep 22
3 min read

Updated: Sep 28


Before the first meeting with your fractional COO, finish this sentence: three months from now, this part of the business should work better. Be specific. ‘New clients get started without me chasing the team’ gives you more to work with than ‘we need better operations.’

Those starting problems should shape the engagement. Otherwise, it’s easy to spend three months attending productive-sounding meetings without knowing whether the business is operating any differently.

The COO Solution’s initial 30-60-90 day plan moves from diagnosis and stabilization to systems and accountability, then execution. 1

The exact priorities should reflect the business and the amount of support engaged. Don’t expect a part-time operator to rebuild every function in a quarter.

Here’s what to look for as the work progresses.

The first month: understand where execution breaks

A new COO needs access to the business as it actually runs. That includes conversations with managers, current priorities, operating reports, and examples of work that has been delayed or repeated. A polished strategy document will only tell part of the story.

Consider a company whose new clients wait too long to get started. Sales may believe delivery is understaffed. Delivery may say the handover arrives without the information needed to begin. Finance may be waiting for someone to confirm the billing details.

Before adding people or software, the COO should trace several recent cases through that process. Where did each one stop? Who noticed? Who could have resolved it? You might discover that the delay has little to do with headcount. A missing handover requirement could be holding up otherwise available people.

Record a starting point while doing this. For onboarding, that might include elapsed time from signed agreement to kickoff, incomplete handovers, and the number of cases requiring founder intervention. Choose the measures that explain this problem; a generic dashboard may miss it entirely.

Urgent problems still need attention during diagnosis. A customer at risk can’t wait while the team completes an audit. The point is to combine immediate stabilization with enough investigation to avoid repeating the same rescue next month.

By day 60: put the new approach to work

An organizational chart is helpful only if it changes how work gets handled. Managers need to know what they own, what they can decide, and when they need to involve someone else.

For the onboarding example, the team might agree on the information required before they accept a handover. One person owns readiness for kickoff. Sales and delivery each have defined responsibilities, and unresolved conflicts go to the COO rather than automatically landing with the founder.

Start with the process causing the most trouble. Test the revised approach on real work before documenting a company-wide system. Ask the people using it where it is unclear or unnecessarily complicated.

For businesses using the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS®), the weekly Scorecard provides a way to keep an eye on things. EOS Worldwide recommends a small set of Measurables, each with an owner and a goal, to flag problems while the team can still respond. 3

For other businesses, the same practical question still helps: which numbers would tell us, this week, that the change is working or needs attention?

The third month: check whether the changes hold

By this stage, review completed work rather than relying on impressions. Compare recent onboarding cases with the starting examples. Check whether the new responsibilities were followed and whether the founder needed to make fewer decisions.

A shorter turnaround is encouraging, but look at how it happened. If the COO personally chased every task, the team may still need clearer ownership or more training. If managers resolved issues within the agreed process, that is evidence the improvement is becoming part of normal operations.

Examine exceptions as well. A process that works for a straightforward customer may struggle with a complex account. The team should know which exceptions need a different route and who can authorize it.

Look beyond the setup work. New software and written procedures are only helping if people use them and the work becomes more reliable.

At 90 days, return to the problems that justified hiring fractional COO services. Review what changed, what remains unresolved, and where the evidence is still too early to interpret. Revenue and profit may take longer to reflect improvements in delivery or management.

Agree on the next priorities using what the first quarter revealed. That might mean extending a tested process, addressing a different constraint, or adjusting the level of support.

The first quarter doesn’t need to solve every problem. It should leave you with a clearer view of the business, visible progress on the agreed priorities, and managers who understand how to keep that work moving.


Perrelet Casino Royale
Northrop & Johnson Yachts for Charter
Nuvolari Lenard
bottom of page